Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Anne Pilsbury

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 10, 1989No. 286, Docket 88-6097PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAHONEY, Circuit Judge:

Anne Pilsbury appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Mark A. Costantino, Judge, summarily holding her in criminal contempt of court pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 401(1) and (3) (1982) and Fed.R. Crim.P. 42(a), and imposing a one thousand dollar fine. On appeal, Pilsbury contends that her conduct did not constitute contempt, as a matter of law. In the alternative, she argues that the trial court erred in punishing her for contempt summarily. Agreeing with appellant’s alternative contention, we reverse and remand.

Backgroun…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Codispoti v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. In re DodsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Banks v. ThomasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. People v. AleemSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  4. United States v. Deatrick MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Shirley RangolanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API