Legal Opinion
Opalack v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 15, 1984No. 618-81CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
OPINION
SPECTOR, Senior Judge.
The contract dispute involved in this case has previously been the subject of two intermingled administrative decisions within the Department of Labor. The second decision was required as the result of obvious procedural irregularities in rendering the first. It is necessary at the threshold to analyze in general terms the subject matter and nature of these decisions in order to establish the jurisdiction of this court to review them and the standards to be applied in that review.
The first of these decisions is captioned:
In the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Austin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Maxwell Dynamometer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Zidell Explorations, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- S.W. Aircraft Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- Bishop Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nicholson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Saunooke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Neal & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Vincent Schickler, TMD U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.