State of Minnesota v. Robin Lyne Hensel
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LARKIN, Judge.
On appeal from her conviction of disorderly conduct for disturbing a city council meeting, appellant argues that (1) Minn. Stat. § 609.72, subd. 1(2), violates the First Amendment,-(2) the district court erred by denying her requested jury instructions, and (8) the evidence is insufficient to support her conviction. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Robin Lyne Hensel is a retired resident of the City of Little Falls. Hensel regularly attends Little Falls City Council meetings. Council meetings take place at the Little Falls City Hall in a room that has a raised dais where the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HenselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Donald Joseph Hall, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016