Legal Opinion

State of Minnesota v. Robin Lyne Hensel

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 25, 2016No. A15-5PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LARKIN, Judge.

On appeal from her conviction of disorderly conduct for disturbing a city council meeting, appellant argues that (1) Minn. Stat. § 609.72, subd. 1(2), violates the First Amendment,-(2) the district court erred by denying her requested jury instructions, and (8) the evidence is insufficient to support her conviction. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Robin Lyne Hensel is a retired resident of the City of Little Falls. Hensel regularly attends Little Falls City Council meetings. Council meetings take place at the Little Falls City Hall in a room that has a raised dais where the…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HenselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. State of Minnesota v. Donald Joseph Hall, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API