State of Minnesota v. Donald Joseph Hall, Jr.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JESSON, Judge.
Appellant Donald Joseph Hall challenges his conviction of stalking under Minnesota Statutes section 609.749, subdivision 2(4), which defines stalking as repeatedly making phone calls, sending text messages, or inducing a victim to make phone calls, whether or not conversation ensues. Hall argues that this portion of the stalking statute is unconstitutionally overbroad in violation of the First Amendment. He also argues that there is insufficient evidence to support his conviction. Because subdivision 2(4) is neither unconstitutionally overbroad on its face nor as applied…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re A.J.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- Lewison v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019