Legal Opinion
DirecTV, Inc. v. Wallace
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided February 9, 2004No. 3:02-1026PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ECHOLS, District Judge.
Presently pending before the Court is Defendant Aaron’s Motion to Dismiss Count V of the Complaint (Docket Entry No. 30), to which Plaintiff has responded in opposition. For the reasons explained herein, Defendant’s Motion shall be GRANTED, and Count V of Plaintiffs Complaint shall be DISMISSED.
I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff DirecTV, Inc. (“DirecTV”) is a direct satellite broadcast system delivering television and other programming to its subscribers. DirecTV’s satellite transmissions are encrypted, or electronically scrambled, to prevent…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Miller v. CurrieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- G.M. Engineers and Associates, Inc. v. West Bloomfield TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Elizabeth Graham Flowers Frankie Dukes v. Tandy Corporation, and William Lee Flowers Martha Floyd GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- B&G Towing LLC v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019