State v. Turchik
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*501VAN HOOMISSEN, J.
Defendant appeals his jury conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. The issue on appeal is whether the police had probable cause to conduct a warrantless search of defendant’s vehicle, and, if so, whether exigent circumstances justified the warrantless search of a closed shoebox found inside the vehicle.
As Officers Stroup and Hawkins were patrolling Highway 97 in Klamath County, they observed a 1976 Volkswagon Rabbit cross the center line twice, the second time in the path of an oncoming truck and trailer. They stopped the vehicle and asked the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. TallmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State v. BingmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. RoundsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. TallmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State v. TallmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.