Legal Opinion
State v. Hesson
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 8, 1996No. 95CA9PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kline, Judge.
Defendant-appellant Tammy Hesson appeals from the judgment of the Washington County Court of Common Pleas finding her guilty of felonious assault in violation of R.C. 2903.11(A)(1). 1 Appellant assigns the following errors:
“1. The trial court erred in not allowing discovery of information tying prosecution witness Joe Lightfritz to three other similar crimes and by not allowing introduction of the evidence already obtained by the defense showing Lightfritz’s involvement in said other crimes.
“2. The trial court erred by not allowing the defense to introduce evidence that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Cummings, Ca2006-09-224 (9-24-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. NguyenOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. Jenkins, Unpublished Decision (5-12-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. ElliottOhio Court of Appeals · 2024