Legal Opinion

A. Magnus Sons Co. v. Orey

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 5, 1923No. 3905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Statement.

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in error brought an action against the defendants in error to recover damages for failure to deliver hops in pursuance of a written contract. The hops were to be grown *3by the defendants on leased lands. The plaintiff alleged that the total amount of hops produced by defendants on the lands described in the contract was 38,429 pounds, leaving 9,607 pounds undelivered; that the contract price of the hops was 11% cents per pound, buh.that the plaintiff had voluntarily increased the same to 16 cents. The measure of damages fixed by the contract in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parks v. ElmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. McCulsky v. KlostermanOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Brown v. A. F. Bartlett & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Millet v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gates v. Carbon Hill Coal Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1923
  2. Romani v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API