Millet v. Taylor
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Napa County and from an order refusing a new trial. Henry' C. Gesford, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an action in unlawful detainer.
The complaint alleges that the defendants were in the possession and occupation of a certain tract of land belonging to the plaintiffs, situated in Napa County, under a lease mutually executed by the parties to this action on the twenty-eighth day of February, 1910; that said lease provided that the same should remain in force for the term of five years from said twenty-eighth day of February, 1910, with an option exercisable by the lessees upon the termination thereof to renew the same for a further period of five years; that, according to the terms of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Germain Fruit Co. v. J. K. Armsby Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Peterson v. ChaixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Higgins v. California Petroleum & Asphalt Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by1 opinion
- A. Magnus Sons Co. v. OreyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923