Legal Opinion

Brown v. A. F. Bartlett & Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1918No. Docket No. 57PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Bay; Houghton, J. Assumpsit by Edward W. Brown against A- F. Bartlett & Company on a contract of employment. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error-

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Defendant is a corporation, located in Saginaw, Michigan, where it is engaged in the manufacture of certain kinds of machinery, operating a plant consisting of a foundry, boiler shop, machine, pattern and blacksmith shops with requisite equipment. It also as a part of its business does repair work of certain kinds and so-called “original jobs” in manufacturing and installing, complete with equipment at an agreed price, such machines or appliances as it manufactures and deals in.

Plaintiff, who was experienced in that line of work and had previously “sold machinery on the road” for others…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rubber Co. v. GoodyearSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Borden v. Fletcher's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Butler v. Iron Cliffs Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Snyder v. SeamanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Allen v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Goodwin, Inc v. Orson E Coe Pontiac, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Brady v. Central Excavators, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Wadsworth v. New York Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Detroit Greyhound Employees Federal Credit Union v. Aetna Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API