Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Fred S. James, P.A., Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 16, 1983No. Civ. A. 82-2416PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BECHTLE, District Judge.

This is a diversity action for wrongful discharge and breach of an oral contract for two years’ employment. Presently before the Court is the motion of defendants Fred S. James, P.A., Inc. (“James”) and Richard Peterson (“Peterson”) for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, the motion will be granted. 1

I. FACTS

Plaintiff is a former employee of defendant James, an insurance brokerage agency and consulting firm. Defendant Peterson is the executive vice-president of defendant James in charge of the Philadelphia office where plaintiff worked. The cause of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Reuther v. Fowler & Williams, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Yaindl v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. Standard Pump-Aldrich DivisionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Clare R. Bruffett v. Warner Communications, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Erie Telecommunications, Inc. v. City of Erie, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. Darlington v. General ElectricSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Rossi v. Pennsylvania State UniversitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Wells v. ThomasDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Temp-Way Corp. v. Continental BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API