Legal Opinion

Mid-Am Builders, Inc. v. Federated Mutual Insurance

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided April 15, 2002No. 2:01-cv-02078PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

McCUSKEY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on cross motions for summary judgment. On October 31, 2001, Plaintiff, Mid-Am Builders, filed an amended complaint alleging that Defendant, Federated Mutual Insurance Company, has a duty to defend them under an insurance policy Federated issued to Hart & Schroeder, a subcontractor working on a project for which Mid-Am Builders was the general contractor. On December 10, 2001, Mid-Am Builders filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (# 23). On December 31, 2001, Federated Mutual Insurance Company also filed a Motion for Summary Judgment…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Robert and Wana McCreary v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. Pecora v. SzaboAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. KB Home Tucson, Inc. v. Charter Oak Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API