Mid-Am Builders, Inc. v. Federated Mutual Insurance
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McCUSKEY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on cross motions for summary judgment. On October 31, 2001, Plaintiff, Mid-Am Builders, filed an amended complaint alleging that Defendant, Federated Mutual Insurance Company, has a duty to defend them under an insurance policy Federated issued to Hart & Schroeder, a subcontractor working on a project for which Mid-Am Builders was the general contractor. On December 10, 2001, Mid-Am Builders filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (# 23). On December 31, 2001, Federated Mutual Insurance Company also filed a Motion for Summary Judgment…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Robert and Wana McCreary v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Pecora v. SzaboAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- KB Home Tucson, Inc. v. Charter Oak Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014