Legal Opinion

Naas v. Welter

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 24, 1904No. Nos. 13,780—(55)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs from an order of the district court for Clay county, Baxter, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a1 trial and findings in favor of defendant for $127.88.

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

Action by plaintiffs to recover advances made upon an executory contract for the purchase of potatoes. The defendant alleges that he executed his part of said agreement and delivered the potatoes, but that plaintiffs refused to receive them. The trial court found in favor of defendant, and entered judgment for the balance due upon said contract, less the amount received by him upon the sale of such potatoes in the open market. From an order denying their motion for a new trial, plaintiffs appeal.

In December, 1902, plaintiffs purchased of defendant two carloads of potatoes, to be delivered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Perkins v. MorseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  2. Hogan v. VinjeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. Johanson v. HoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rueger v. HawksNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Gourd v. County of MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. Keller v. WolfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. Menardi v. WackerNevada Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API