Legal Opinion

Johanson v. Hoff

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 7, 1897No. Nos. 10,399—(160)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From an order of tbe probate court for St. Louis county disallowing bis claim against tbe estate of Neis J. Hoff, deceased, plaintiff appealed to tbe district court of that county. Tbe case was tried before Morris, J., who found that plaintiff was entitled to allowance of Ms claim of $435. From an order denying a motion for a new trial defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

For a second time this case appears before us on appeals from orders denying defendant’s motions for a new trial. The facts are sufficiently stated in the former opinion. 63 Minn. 296, 65 N. W. 464. The second trial was had before the court without a jury, and upon its findings of fact judgment was ordered in favor of plaintiff. Although counsel for defendant has set forth 43 assignments of error, we are of the opinion that two questions only need consideration. In fact, counsel himself is content to dispose of 17 of his assignments quite summarily by stating, in his brief, that no argument…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johanson v. HoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Naas v. WelterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  3. Johanson v. HoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  4. Weiss v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API