Legal Opinion

In re Exemption From Electronic Public Access Fees by Jennifer Gollan & Shane Shifflett

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 29, 2013No. 12-16373PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge O’SCANNLAIN; Concurrence by Judge O’SCANNLAIN.

OPINION

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We must consider our power to review a district court’s administrative order denying an exemption from the fees associated with electronic access to court records.

I

A

With the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (“PACER”) system users can view and print case filings, judicial opinions, and other docket information from the federal trial, bankruptcy, and appellate courts. Congress has authorized the Judicial Conference of the United States1 to raise funds to support PACER by setting appropriate…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ayestas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. Unified Data Services, LLC v. FTCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  3. United States v. Douglas DecincesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. (PS) Halousek v. CA Public Employees' Retirement SystemDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. Angela Reliford v. Christopher M. Brown, et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2025

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API