(PS) Halousek v. CA Public Employees' Retirement System

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHEILA HALOUSEK, Case No. 2:23-cv-839-KJM-CSK (PS) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR PACER FEE EXEMPTION 13 v. (ECF No. 16.) 14 CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Shiela Halousek asserts claims against Defendant California Public 18 Employees’ Retirement System (“CalPERS”) and “State of California Department of 19 Justice Office of the Attorney General.”1 (See ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff requests the Court 20 approve her request for exemption from…