Primrose v. Browning
Supreme Court of Georgia
Claim. Levy and sale. Husband and wife. Practice in the Superior Court. Amendment. Debtor and creditor. Eraudulent conveyance. Before Judge Pottle. Richmond Superior Court. April Term, 1877. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Warner, Chief Justice.
This was a claim case, on the trial of which the jury, under the charge of the court, found the property subject to the plaintiff’s ft. fa. levied thereon. The claimant made a motion for a new trial on the several grounds therein stated, which was overruled, and the claimant excepted. It appears from the record and bill of exceptions, that the plaintiff, at the trial, introduced the sheriff as a witness to prove that the defendant in the ft. fa. was in possession of the property at the time of the levy. The sheriff stated that the defendant was living in the house, and…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Broome v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Yarborough v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Keeter v. Bank of EllijaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Richardson & Co. v. SubersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Powell v. WestmorelandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.