Legal Opinion

Jeroma v. McNally

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 6, 1949PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

This is an action of tort. The declaration is in three counts, the first for personal injuries to Hazel C. Jeroma, the second for personal injuries to her daughter, Lorraine M. Jeroma, and the third for consequential damages to the husband of Hazel C. Jeroma resulting from the injuries to her. G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 231, § 4A, as inserted *386by St. 1943, c. 350, § 1; § 6A, as inserted by St. 1939, c. 372, § 1. Repucci v. Exchange Realty Co. 321 Mass. 571. Clouatre v. Lees, 321 Mass. 679. There were verdicts for the several plaintiffs on all the counts, and the case comes here on the exceptions of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brennan v. Ocean View Amusement Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Lemoine v. Springfield Hockey Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Callahan v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Repucci v. Exchange Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Rouillard v. Canadian Klondike Club, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rita Beaulieu v. Lincoln Rides, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  2. Reardon v. Country Club at Coonamessett, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API