Legal Opinion

Carolina Eastern, Inc. v. Benson Agri Supply, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 17, 1984No. 8311SC13PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

Defendants’ motion for a directed verdict tests the legal sufficiency of plaintiffs evidence to take the case to the jury and support a verdict for plaintiff. Wallace v. Evans, 60 N.C. App. 145, 298 S.E. 2d 193 (1982). A directed verdict, thus, is proper when plaintiffs evidence is insufficient to establish a valid contract. See, e.g., Stewart v. Insurance Co., 20 N.C. App. 25, 200 S.E. 2d 434 (1973), cert. denied, 284 N.C. 623, 202 S.E. 2d 278 (1974). Since consideration is essential to a valid guaranty contract and since we find no evidence of consideration supporting…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wallace Ex Rel. Magers v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Proffitt v. SittonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  3. Duncan v. HellerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1880
  4. Lowndes v. McCabe Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  5. Stewart v. Occidental Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brzezinek v. Covenant InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. Klingstubbins Southeast, Inc. v. 301 Hillsborough Street Partners, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. Angel Medical Center, Inc. v. AbernathyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2000
  4. Brown v. Artisan 2510, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. Klingstubbins Southeast, Inc. v. 301 Hillsborough Street Partners, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API