Legal Opinion

Klingstubbins Southeast, Inc. v. 301 Hillsborough Street Partners, LLC

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 17, 2012No. COA11-549PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals the trial court order allowing defendant Theodore R. Reynolds’s motion to dismiss. For the following reasons, we reverse.

*257I. Background

On 13 August 2010, plaintiff filed a verified complaint against defendants requesting payment for “architectural services” which plaintiff performed for the design of a building for defendant 301 Hillsborough Street Partners, LCC (“Hillsborough”). Plaintiff also alleged a claim against defendant Theodore R. Reynolds (“Reynolds”) as guarantor of defendant Hillsborough’s obligation to plaintiff. Attached to plaintiff’s complaint…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Block v. County of PersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Standard Supply Co. v. PersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Carolina Eastern, Inc. v. Benson Agri Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fagundes v. Ammons Dev. Grp., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  2. Klingstubbins Southeast, Inc. v. 301 Hillsborough Street Partners, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API