Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cardozo v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 23, 1983No. CA CR 82-158Published

1DissentJames R. Cooper, Judge

While I do not disagree with the majority opinion as it relates to the evidence obtained through the warrantless search, I respectfully dissent from that portion of the opinion which affirms the trial court’s refusal to suppress the evidence obtained through the search warrant. The affidavit for the search warrant described the property in question and showed that the affiant, Sheriff Ray Watkins, had personally observed marijuana growing on the property. However, there was no information whatsoever contained in the affidavit as to when Sheriff Watkins observed the growing marijuana. I…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Sgro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Samuel Rosencranz v. United States of America, Anthony Dipietro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
  5. George Washington Durham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API