Legal Opinion

Flinn v. Flynn

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 11, 1954No. 18411PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) 1. It is a well-settled rule that all persons who are directly or consequentially interested in the result of litigation should be made parties, either plaintiff or defendant, to proceedings for equitable relief. Code § 37-1004; Wyche v. Green, 32 Ga. 341; Blaisdell v. Bohr, 68 Ga. 56; Henderson v. Napier, 107 Ga. 342 (33 S. E. 433); Bond v. Hunt, 135 Ga. 733 (1) (70 S. E. 572); First National Bank of Sparta v. Wiley, 150 Ga. 759 (2) (105 S. E. 308). A petition for equitable relief which fails to name essential and indispensable parties,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Blaisdell v. BohrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  2. Campbell v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  3. Walden v. WaldenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  4. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  5. Ennis v. EnnisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coe v. Greenville Credit & Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  2. Gray v. Georgia Development Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  3. Jowers v. GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  4. Oliver v. OliverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  5. Deen v. McCorkleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API