Deen v. McCorkle
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Justice.
Robert Hemy Deen and Mildred B. Deen as *22next friend of Doris Beth Deen, intervenors (plaintiffs in error here), should have been permitted to intervene because as heirs of Mrs. Fannie Dickenson they were interested in the subject matter, the assets of her estate, and had rights that they were entitled to assert in setting aside the discharge of the administrator and compelling him to account to them for their respective shares of the estate... “A court of equity may bring before it and adjudicate for all parties who have a common interest in a single subject-matter, as had…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Flinn v. FlynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- Bryan v. BryanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Tison v. TisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852