Legal Opinion

Schuster v. Crawford

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 21, 1917No. 754PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from District Court, El Paso County; P. R. Price, Judge. Suit by L. M. Crawford, trustee, against Bernard Schuster and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

By deed dated February 26, 1906, the Bailey Hotel Company, for a consideration of $30,000, conveyed to “L. M. Crawford, trustee,” certain lands with the improvements thereon. The habendum clause as well as the warranty of title was to “L. M. Crawford, trustee, his successors or assigns.” Other provisions are contained in the deed, but it is unnecessary to mention same. The deed is altogether silent as to the purposes of the trust and in no wise discloses the identity of the cestui or cestuis que trust

On July 30, 1913, L. M. Crawford, trustee, made a written lease of the premises to Howard…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. CahillTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Ebell v. BursingerTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Monday v. VanceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  4. Sawyer v. First National Bank of HicoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bingham v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Continental Supply Co. v. Forrest E. Gilmore Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Peoples Bank of Jax. v. Va. Bridge Iron Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1927
  4. Smith v. WaymanTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API