Legal Opinion

Continental Supply Co. v. Forrest E. Gilmore Co. of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 16, 1932No. 3832PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, O. J.

The appellant the Continental Supply Company (hereinafter called the supply company) instituted this suit against the Forrest E. Gilmore Company (hereinafter called the Delaware company), the Forrest E. Gilmore Company of Texas (hereinafter called the Texas company), the Western Supply Company, Worthington Machinery Corporation of Oklahoma, Joseph Greenspon’s Son Iron & Steel Company, and two other companies which were subsequently dismissed from the suit, in which cause the Security Savings & Trust Company of Portland, Or. (hereinafter called the Security company), the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Boon v. F. M. Weathered's AdministratorTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Texas Western Railway Co. v. GentryTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Buie v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Bingham v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. International Bankers Life Insurance Co. v. HollowayTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Harris v. Thornton's Department StoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Tigrett v. PointerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Pacific American Gasoline Co. of Texas v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  5. Bush v. GaffneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API