Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 13, 2005No. AC 25144PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FOTI, J.

The defendant, Tyish Smith, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of burglary in the first degree, conspiracy to commit burglary in the first degree, robbery in the first degree and conspiracy to commit robbery in the first degree. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) prosecutorial misconduct during the state’s rebuttal argument to the jury deprived him of a fair trial, (2) the trial court improperly instructed the jury and (3) the cumulative effect of the prosecutorial misconduct and the court’s improper jury instructions deprived him of a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. Jacobs v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  4. State v. MuleroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  5. State v. Antonio A.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. McCarthyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API