Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 29, 2016No. 2015AP2408Published

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1.

LUNDSTEN, J.

This appeal relates to the enforceability of an automobile insurance policy provision that is part of the policy's definition of an underin-sured motor vehicle. As pertinent here, this provision has the effect of excluding passengers of an insured's vehicle from the policy's underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage when the insured driver was at fault and was operating a vehicle insured by the policy's liability coverage. The main purpose of this exclusion, as explained below, is to prevent a policy's UIM coverage from acting as supplementary liability coverage under the same…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Millers Casualty Insurance Co. of Texas v. BriggsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Taylor v. Travelers Indem. Co. of AmericaArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Welin v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. MERCURY INDEM. CO. OF ILLINOIS v. KimAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. Lewis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API