Legal Opinion
Claxton v. Zolin
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 29, 1992No. F016942PublishedCited by 4 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEST, P. J.
Introduction
The Department of Motor Vehicles (Department) appeals from a judgment of the superior court granting a petition for writ of mandate directing the Department to set aside an order suspending respondents’ driving privileges and to pay respondents’ attorney fees.
Respondents were arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol and the Department suspended their driver’s licenses pursuant to the administrative per se statute, Vehicle Code section 13353.2, subdivision (a). They were charged with violations of section 23152, subdivisions (a) and (b), 2 but were…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- August v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Lofthouse v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Agresti v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gikas v. ZolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Gustafson v. ZolinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Gikas v. ZolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Mosier v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993