Legal Opinion

Meigs v. London Assur. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 1904No. 72PublishedCited by 11 opinions

At Law. Trial by the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

The facts are not in dispute, and I find them to be as follows:(1) The plaintiff is the owner of a group of buildings at Potts-town, Pa., which he uses for a boys’ boarding school. It is well and widely known as the “Hill School.” On February 17, 1900, he insured the main building, consisting of several wings or attached buildings, and also its contents, for three years, in 10 fire insurance companies, the policies insuring $130,000 on the building, which was its full value, and $50,000 on its contents. 1 These policies will be spoken of as “Class A.” They…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. Baltimore Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Pitney v. . Glen's Falls Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Sloat v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864
  4. Meigs v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  5. Ogden v. . East River Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Mercantile Town Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Ben-Hur Manufacturing Co. v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of New JerseyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Odegard v. General Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  4. Pearl Assur. Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. Turk v. Newark Fire Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API