Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. State Accident Commission v. Carroll-Howard Supply Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 4, 1944No. [No. 17, April Term, 1944.]PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment n. o. v. for costs in favor of the defendants, entered under Trial Rule 8 of the General Rules of Practice and Procedure, 1941, on motion of the defendants after the jury empaneled to try the case had been discharged for failure to agree on a verdict. At the trial each of the defendants, Carroll-Howard Supply Company, Inc., and Hayden H. Bond, moved for a directed verdict for the following reasons: because there was no evidence in the case legally sufficient to entitle the plaintiff to recover; because there was no evidence in the case…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jones v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
  2. Slacum v. JolleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  3. Cooke v. Baltimore Traction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  4. Merrifield v. C. Hoffberger Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  5. Holler v. LoweryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Eisenhower v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  2. Meldrum v. Kellam Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  3. Yellow Cab Co. v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  4. Beck v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  5. Bernardi v. RoedelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API