Legal Opinion

Ralph R. COSTILLA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 12, 1988No. 86-2652PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge:

We withdraw our writing in part IIA of our former opinion 826 F.2d 1444, 1447 (5th Cir.1987) and our conclusion at 1448.

We persist in rejecting plaintiff’s argument that his recovery may be sustained by the jury finding in response to Interrogatory No. 10 that “the bottle cap was unfit for the ordinary purposes for which it was intended.”

Clearly Texas law recognizes that strict liability under § 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts and breach of an implied warranty of merchantability are two separate causes of action. Garcia v. Texas Instruments, Inc., 610…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alm v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Nobility Homes of Texas, Inc. v. ShiversTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Garcia v. Texas Instruments, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Luda Foster, Etc. v. Ford Motor Company, McLean Trucking Company v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  5. Daniel Brewer v. Jeep Corporation, American Motors Sales Corporation and American Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hyundai Motor Co. v. Rodriguez Ex Rel. RodriguezTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Otis Spunkmeyer, Inc. v. Blakely, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
  3. Rodriguez Ex Rel. Rodriguez v. Hyundai Motor Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  4. In Re Highland Financial Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  5. Aluminum Co. of America v. AlmTexas Supreme Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API