Legal Opinion · Dissent

Aluminum Co. of America v. Alm

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1990No. C-7889Published

1DissentGonzalez, Justice

I am astounded that the court has concluded as a matter of law that Seven-Up was not an appropriate intermediary through which Alcoa could have discharged its duty to warn ultimate consumers. I am absolutely flabbergasted that the court has effectively held that under these facts Alcoa was grossly negligent as a matter of law. To the best of my knowledge, this is the first time in the history of American *141jurisprudence that a court has held that a jury could not disbelieve a plaintiff’s case as to gross negligence when the issue is disputed, and that a court should determine this issue as a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Burk Royalty Co. v. WallsTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Herbert v. HerbertTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Alm v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Williams v. Steves Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API