Legal Opinion

Sayers v. First National Bank

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883No. 9950PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The complaint as it originally stood was upon a promissory note and mortgage; but before trial so much of the complaint as sought an enforcement of the mortgage was withdrawn.

The name First National Bank of Crawfordsville imports a corporation, and it was not necessary for the pleader to allege that the appellee was incorporated. Where the name used “argues a corporation,” there is no necessity for averring a corporate organization. Mackenzie v. Board, etc., 72 Ind. 189; Indianapolis Sun Co. v. Horrell, 53 Ind. 527.

The note was endorsed by the payee to the immediate endorsee of appellee in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Locke v. Merchants National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Mackenzie v. Board of School TrusteesIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Indianapolis Sun Co. v. HorrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Boffandick v. RaleighIndiana Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adams Express Co. v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Beckman v. Beckman State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Joseph Holmes Fuel & Feed Co. v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  4. Grand Rapids Motor Express, Inc. v. CrosbieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. State v. SnyderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API