Legal Opinion

Eikenberry v. Adirondack Spring Water Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 30, 1985PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Kaye, J.

Where an extension agreement for the repayment of a debt is void, because of a usurious rate of interest, the invalidity of that agreement does not extinguish defendants’ liability to plaintiff for the debt under the parties’ original contract.

Plaintiff rendered legal services to defendants pursuant to a November 12,1974 retainer agreement, with agreed hourly fees to be paid partly at the rate of $500 a month and partly upon the disposition of certain litigation. When defendants terminated the representation in February 1976, they owed plaintiff *127$17,965 in fees and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hammelburger v. Foursome Inn Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Diehl v. . BeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. London v. ToneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Real Estate Trust Company v. . KeechNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. Winsted Bank v. . WebbNew York Court of Appeals · 1868

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kenniff v. CaulfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Hutchison v. MassieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Nicholson v. TarpeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Massie v. HutchesonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Nemo v. FarringtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API