Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. Trinity Valley Produce Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 5, 1925No. 119PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This cause is before us on motion for rehearing. The opinion heretofore written is withdrawn and this is filed as the opinion of the court.

At a former day this cause was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Plaintiff in error filed its motion, asking for certiorari to the trial court to perfect the record in order to show that the court has jurisdiction. The motion was granted and the additional records of the trial court have been filed in this court, which show that this court has jurisdiction of this cause, and we therefore grant plaintiff in error's motion to reinstate the cause, and we…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pecos & Northern Texas Railway Co. v. RayzorTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Steger v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Hall v. Williams EllisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. ErwinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Independent Shope Brick Co. v. DuggerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. Fike v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Southwest Nat. Bank of Dallas v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Waxahachie Nat. Bank v. HanesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API