Legal Opinion

Hall v. Williams Ellis

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 18, 1924No. 127PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GALLAGHER, O. J.

Defendants in error, Williams & Ellis, sued plaintiff in error, Frank J. Hall, to recover tike sum of $350 which they claimed to be due them as commissions for services as brokers in effecting a sale of a certain piece of real estate. The parties will be designated as in the trial court. The case was submitted to a jury on special issues, in response to which, among other things, the jury found that plaintiffs were the procuring cause of the sale of. the property, that defendant listed the same with them for sale, and that the reasonable and customary compensation for the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gulf, Texas & Western Railway Co. v. DickeyTexas Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Houston East & West Texas Railway Co. v. De WaltTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Moore v. PiersonTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Crain v. HuntingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Worden v. KroegerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Gulf Paving Co. v. LofstedtTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Security Union Ins. Co. v. McLeodTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. Huff v. Harrell, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  4. Epting v. NeesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Baker Co. v. TurpinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API