Legal Opinion

Wenger v. Clay Township

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1916No. 8,991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From tlie St. Joseph. Circuit Court; Walter A. Funk, Judge. Action by Susana Wenger and others against Clay Township of St. Joseph County and others. From a judgment for defendants, the plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtIbach, C. J.

Appellant Susana Wenger entered into a written contract with appellee township, in the year 1903, whereby she conveyed and warranted to appellee “the right to take gravel, sand and soil” from certain lands owned by her at that time, and in which the remaining appellants acquired an interest afterwards. The remaining *641provisions of the contract material to the question we are called upon to determine are: “The said gravel, sand and soil to be taken in such quantities, from such points and at such times as said second party (appellee) desires. The said second party agrees to pay first party the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Knight v. Indiana Coal & Iron Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Heller v. DaileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Quality Clothes Shop v. KeeneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Muncie Electric Light Co. v. JoliffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Randall v. GhentIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ammendale Normal Institute, Inc. v. Schrom Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  2. Moore v. SchultzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  3. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. HughesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API