Legal Opinion
In re Friedman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 26, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
At the primary election held on April 5, 1932, there were three sets of candidates for party positions, to wit, members of the State committee of the Democratic party for the fourteenth Assembly district of Kings county. The vote for the third set was inconsiderable and may be disregarded. The “ regular ” candidates, Joseph Lentol and Nora Quinn, received, respectively, 4,297 and 4,243 votes, while the opposing candidates, Joshua H. Friedman and Ethel Walsh, received, respectively, 3,949 and 3,884 votes, as the canvass showed, in the twenty-one election districts. This gave to Lentol and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re BarrettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- In re WeinfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- In re MedburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- In re DolenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- In re WilberNew York Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by6 opinions
- DeSapio v. KochAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- In re GoldinNew York Supreme Court · 1939
- In re GordonNew York Supreme Court · 1939
- In re FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Lucadana v. LucadanaNew York Supreme Court · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.