Legal Opinion
In re Weinfeld
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 7, 1922PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Clarke, P. J.:
This proceeding was instituted by an order to show cause addressed to the board of elections and county board of canvassers of the city of New York, county clerk of New York county, and Sol Ullman and Samuel E. Beardsley, candidates for the office of Member of Assembly, sixth district, New York county, at the general election held November 7, 1922, to show cause at a Special Term of the Supreme Court why the justice of this court before whom this proceeding may be heard shall not determine such questions as may arise in respect to the protested, wholly blank and void ballots…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of Whitman. No. 1New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Matter of Tamney v. . AtkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- People Ex Rel. Feeny v. . Bd. of CanvassersNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re CarsonNew York Supreme Court · 1937
- Pauly v. MahoneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Bennett v. Board of ElectionsNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- In re FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- In re GabelmannNew York Supreme Court · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.