Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Friedman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 20, 1933Published

1Dissent

Davis, J. (dissenting).

I agree that the court at Special Term did not follow the instructions given in remitting this matter for a hearing. The proceedings on the recount and in respect to the ordering of a new primary election were entirely irregular and no definite result was obtained. We said on the former appeal (238 App. Div. 341, 344): “ We are convinced by the proof offered that there is great doubt of a free choice by a free electorate of the candidates for party position and of an honest count such as our scheme of representative government contemplates.” The record on that appeal…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API