Fluke Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.
The Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company challenges the decision of the Court of Appeals that, under the terms of the Commercial General Liability (CGL) policy that Hartford sold to Fluke Corporation, Hartford was obligated to pay both the compensatory and punitive damages that a California jury awarded against Fluke in a malicious prosecution action. In this declaratory judgment action, the trial court and the Court of Appeals concluded that public policy in Washington did not negate the CGL policy’s unambiguous grant of liability coverage for malicious prosecution. See Fluke Corp. v.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. WiscombWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Downey Venture v. LMI Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Island County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fairfield Insurance Co. v. Stephens Martin Paving, LPTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Expedia, Inc. v. Steadfast InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Hamm v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Fluke Corp. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Tilden-Coil Constructors, Inc. v. Landmark American InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.