Legal Opinion

Fluke Corp. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 2001No. 70519-4PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

34 P.3d 809 (2001)

145 Wash.2d 137

FLUKE CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, Respondent,

v.

The HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, a foreign insurance corporation, Petitioner,

Talon Instruments, Inc., a California corporation; and Robert E. Corby, Defendants.

No. 70519-4.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued September 11, 2001.

Decided November 21, 2001.

Phillips & Webster, K.C. Webster, Woodinville, counsel for petitioner.

Danielson, Harrigan & Tollefson, G. Val Tollefson, Matthew Ryan Kenney, Randall Thor Thomsen, Seattle, counsel for respondent.

Linda Blohm Clapham, Robert Leon Israel,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. WiscombWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Downey Venture v. LMI Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Island County v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Fairfield Insurance Co. v. Stephens Martin Paving, LPTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Expedia, Inc. v. Steadfast InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Hamm v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In re the Marriage of HammackCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. PasiakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API