Legal Opinion

Flores v. Thorn

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1852PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from ISTacogcloches.

1Opinion of the CourtLipscomb, J.

This suit was brought to recover an amount alleged by tho plaintiff to be due him from the defendant for his attendance as a witness at his (the defendant’s) instance in several suits depending at the time of such attendance in the District Court of Nacogdoches county. In support of his action tlie plaintiff, in his amended petition, set out various certificates of the cleric of the District Court for that county, certifying to the amount due on each, and that the witness had sworn to the same, adding that witness was entitled to the amount therein stated from the party who "might be adjudged…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Hedges v. ArmisteadTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Houston & G. N. R. R. Co. v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Early & Clement Grain Co. v. FiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. International & Great Northern Railroad v. RichmondCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API