Legal Opinion

Gamble v. Gates

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1892PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Bay. (Cobb, J.) Replevin. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

December 26, 1885, Henry Gamble was the ■owner'of certain lands in Bay cou-nty, and on that day he entered into a written contract with defendant. The contract contained the following stipulations:

“ That the said party of the first part, upon the fulfillment by said second party of the conditions hereinafter mentioned, hereby agrees to sell, assign, transfer, and set over unto the said party of the second part all the white pine and Norway timber standing, lying, or being upon the following described pieces or parcels of land.”

The contract then sets out the descriptions of land, and continues:

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Green v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hodges v. BuellMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Macomber v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Kerschensteiner v. Northern Michigan Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Mahar v. Grand Rapids Terminal Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Bennett v. Vinton Lumber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API