Legal Opinion

Mahar v. Grand Rapids Terminal Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1913No. Docket No. 41PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Kent; Brown, J. Bill by William Mahar against the Grand Rapids Terminal Railway Company for the removal of a cloud on complainant’s title to land and for other relief. From a decree for complainant, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

Clara O. Russell and Etta C. Boltwood were the owners in fee simple of certain real estate in the city of Grand Rapids, which is involved in this controversy, which property is located just west of Canal street, south of Mason street, and extending west to the center of Grand river.

On December 11, 1901, the said Clara C. Russell and Etta C. Boltwood conveyed, by an instrument in writing, to Marshall F. Buttars, trustee, of Ludington, Mich., a right of way 50 feet in width across the said real estate. This instrument provided:

_ “ That the said parties of the first part, for and in…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Story v. . New York Elevated R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Nicoll v. . the New-York and Erie Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1854
  3. Nellis v. . MunsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Reichenbach v. Washington Short Line Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Nowlin Lumber Co. v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Quinn v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Department of Natural Resources v. Carmody-Lahti Real Estate, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Moakley v. Los Angeles Pacific Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Epworth Assembly v. Ludington & Northern RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. City of Boyne City v. CrainMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API