Legal Opinion

Macomber v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1896PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error to Montcalm; Davis, J. Replevin by Allen Macomber and another against the Detroit, Lansing & Northern Railroad Company. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

On the 22d day of July, 1892, the Cutler & Savage Lumber Company executed a writing to one John S. Wiedman, containing the following provisions :

“The Cutler & Savage Lumber Company has this day sold to J. S. Wiedman, of Lake View, Michigan, all of the timber on the entire section twenty-nine, in town thirteen north, of range seven west. The said J. S. Wiedman is to remove the timber in two years from this date; and, in case the said Cutler & Savage Lumber Company *492sell any of said land, the said J. S. Wiedman is to remove the timber from the land sold at once, on being notified of the said…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. FloodMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Golden v. GlockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Hicks v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Gamble v. GatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Miller v. HavensMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. C. W. Zimmerman Mnfg. Co. v. DaffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  2. Bunch v. Elizabeth City Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Hawkins v. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. BoykinTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Hodges v. BuellMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API