Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided June 25, 2010No. 2181PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MASSIAH-JACKSON, J,

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In February, 2007, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania commenced litigation against three pharmaceutical companies: Eli Lilly & Company Inc., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Janssen), and AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals L.P. The Commonwealth claimed it was seeking to recover, inter alia, expenses incurred for reimbursing pharmacies for the purchase of Risperdal and other antipsychotic drugs manufactured by these defendants. At that time, the plaintiff alleged that the defendant pharmaceutical companies promoted their respective antipsychotic drugs…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Robertson v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API