Maritas v. Carpet Linoleum Service, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TENNEY, District Judge.
In this dispute over contributions allegedly due a union benefit fund under the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement, the defendants move to vacate a default judgment and for partial summary judgment. The default is vacated, and summary judgment is granted to the defendants in part, to the plaintiffs in part, and denied in part.
Background
The facts are uncontested. Plaintiffs are trustees of the New York District Council of Carpenters Benefit Funds (“Fund”). Defendant Carpet Linoleum Service, Inc. is a New Jersey corporation that provides and installs…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Walsh v. SchlechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Flynn v. Dick Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Pedro v. Teamsters Local 490District Court, N.D. California · 1981