Legal Opinion
Barcel v. Barrel Finish
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 18, 1975No. 44999PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Scott, Justice.
Relators challenge the finding of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission that the employer received notice of the employee’s injury within the time period allowed by Minn. St. 176.141. We affirm.
The employee first experienced numbness in his right hand and forearm during the early part of 1971. The sensation was intermittent and did not interfere with his work. The employee discontinued his employment with Barrel Finish in March of 1972 for reasons unrelated to his disability. In June 1972, he saw a chiropractor for the worsening symptoms, was unsuccessfully treated for a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Strei v. Church of St. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Balow v. Kellogg Cooperative Creamery AssociationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Davidson v. Bermo, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
3Cited by8 opinions
- Issacson v. Minnetonka, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Jones v. Thermo KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Jensen v. Kronick's Floor Covering ServiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Rebiski v. Pioneer Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Anderson v. Frontier CommunicationsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.