Legal Opinion

Issacson v. Minnetonka, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 11, 1987No. C3-87-940PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KELLEY, Justice.

A compensation judge, in denying respondent Helen Issacson’s claims for workers’ compensation benefits, found that she, an employee of Minnetonka, Inc., had failed to give the statutory notice of injury which is a precedent requirement to the successful establishment of a claim for benefits. In a split decision the Workers’ Compensa tion Court of Appeals vacated that finding and substituted a finding that the employer had received the statutory notice or had knowledge of Ms. Issacson’s alleged work injury.. 1 We reverse.

In April 1979, employee began working for employer…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Pojanowski v. HartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Rinne v. W. C. Griffis Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Greene v. W & W GENERATOR REBUILDERSSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Russell Coal Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  2. Tieszen v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Jones v. Thermo KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Freyholtz v. Blackduck School District 32Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  5. Anderson v. Frontier CommunicationsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API